Tag Archives: spelling changes

Catching some z’s

By now I’m well into the “c” section of Spanish Word Histories and Mysteries. This is decent progress, since in my previous post inspired by this book I was only in the “b’s”. However, my perusal ground to a halt yesterday when I read about the English word cedilla, which is a straight borrowing of the Spanish word cedilla. The cedilla is the little hook that some languages use under a letter, most often the letter c, to represent certain pronunciations. In French the cedilla softens a c to a /s/ before a or o, as in français ‘French’ or garçon ‘waiter’. A plain (no-cedilla) French c is pronounced /k/ before these vowels, as in carte ‘menu’ or couper ‘to cut’.

The cedilla is not used in Modern Spanish, but in Old Spanish ç was pronounced /ts/, as in the middle of pizza. As in French, ç was only used before a or o, for example in Old Spanish caçar ‘to hunt’ (now cazar) and alço ‘I raise’ (now alzo). As Old Spanish became Modern, the sound /ts/ disappeared, and words previously written with a ç switched to a z, as shown above, that was (and is) pronounced either s or th, depending on one’s dialect.

Histories and Mysteries explains that the cedilla under ç originated as a miniature letter z. This is apparent if you look at a large ç (below). In Spanish, ceda is a variant spelling of zeta, the name of the letter z, so cedilla, with the diminutive -illa suffix, simply means ‘little z‘.

I never knew this! and it makes me enormously happy because the tilde (~) over the beloved Spanish ñ originated as a small letter n. What an awesome parallel! But it also made me realize, for the first time, the irony of zeta, the Spanish word for the letter z.

Why ironic? Because one of the rules of Spanish spelling is that z is only used before a, o, and u, and is replaced by c before e or i. You can see this in the Spanish spelling of cebra and cero (below), and in spelling alternations like empezar ‘to begin’ and empiezo ‘I begin’, versus ¡Empiece! ‘Begin!’ and empecé ‘I began’. Most words that violate this rule are recent borrowings like zepelín ‘zeppelin’, zenit ‘zenith’, zig-zag, zinc (the metal) and zigoto ‘zygote’. Ironically, the word zeta is another exception.

As far as I know, this rule lacks a logical explanation, since the pronunciation of the letter z isn’t affected by the vowel that follows it. The c/z alternation is thus different from the language’s other spelling alternations, which are well motivated. For example, adding a u to a g in verb forms like pagué ‘I paid’ preserves the hard /g/ sound of the verb pagar. For this reason I’m afraid I used to tell my students that it was “a stupid rule of Spanish” to always use c, not z, before e and i. Honestly, I’ve looked for explanations, but have never found one that satisfies me.

So the “irony of zeta“, alluded to above, is simply that its spelling violates the Spanish spelling rule for the letter z. To put it another way, you can’t state the rule “Don’t use the letter z before e or i” without breaking it: No se usa la letra zeta antes de e o i.” What an oxymoron! I don’t know if cedilla will be one of my 100 words, but I must mention this irony.

By the way, although zepelín and zig-zag seem to be maintaining their alien z spellings, the hispanized spellings cinc and cigoto have threatened or surpassed the originals, as shown in the Google ngram results in the slideshow below. This shows that the c/z spelling rule, motivated or not, maintains its force in modern Spanish.

Más allá de [beyond] car/gar/zar

[Today is Spanish Friday so this post is in Spanish. ¡Scroll down for English translation!]

Todos conocemos (o debemos conocer) los cambios ortográficos que sufren los verbos que terminan en ‑car, ‑gar, y ‑zar. Por ejemplo escribimos saquéjugué, y almorcé en vez de conservar los letras originales (cg, y z). Para el cambio de cqu y el de gqu hay un buen motivo: conservar el sonido original (/k/ o /g/). Para el cambio de zsolo hay el motivo conservador de no usar la letra z antes de e. Es por eso que el español pidió prestado la palabra italiana zero como cero.

El español tiene un montón de otros tales cambios ortográficos. Recientemente reuní una lista de ellos. Aquí están en toda su gloria. No incluí los cambios de ‑car, ‑gar, y ‑zar por ser demasiado conocidos.

cambios ortográficos

Es importante tener en cuenta que estos cambios solo afectan la ortografía, no la pronunciación. Ni se deben considerar irregularidades, porque son predecibles. Es decir que cualquier palabra con tal ortografía sufriría el mismo cambio.

——————————————————————————————————-

All of us are (or should be) aware of the spelling changes that afflict verbs that end in ‑car, ‑gar, and ‑zar. For example, we write saquéjugué, y almorcé instead of keeping the original consonants (cg, y z). There’s a solid motive for the changes of c to qu and of g to qu: to keep the original sound (/k/ or /g/). The only reason for the change of z to z is the spelling rule that prohibits z before e (this is why Spanish borrowed the Italian word (zero as cero).

Spanish has an impressive quantity of other such spelling changes. I recently made a list of all of them to share with you in their orthographic glory. I didn’t include the ‑car, ‑gar, and ‑zar changes themselves because they’re too well known.

cambios ortográficos en

It’s important to keep in mind that these changes only affect spelling, not pronunciation. Nor should they be considered irregularities, because they’re predictable. That is, any word spelled like these would undergo the same changes.